Don't spend $3.4 million on a new driving range for the West Seattle Golf course!
306 votes
I disagreeRank6
Idea#51
Vote Activity Show
-
Disagreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Disagreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
Similar Ideas Show
Comments (6)
-
Golf players are already paying for the upgrades. Golf is one of the only profitable parks budget line items. Golf players are paying for the upgrades, as well as a lot of other (less profitable and non-golf-related) parks activities.
00 -
And don't go ahead and spend the money for a driving range after presenting a design that many golfers don't even like and actually think will ruin the course!
00 -
If you can demonstrate that this upgrade can be a profit-generator for the city in the short term (1-5 years) go for it, otherwise nix it.
00 -
I play golf, and I agree. I should pay for golf course upgrades. Library users should pay for library upgrades. Zoo goers should pay for zoo upgrades.
00 -
Why on earth is the city in the golf business? Providing entertainment for citizens is hardly a proper function of the government? This is completely absurd. I'm sorry if the average Joe can't afford to join a country club, but that still doesn't make running golf courses a proper function of the government.
00 -
Plow the golf courses, plant the fields, feed the homeless. It's a disgusting excuse for a 'sport'.
00
Social Web